The Daily Telegraph newspaper today demanded the resignation of John Prescott, citing five reasons why he should go.The paper says its conclusion is not because Prescott has been taken in adultery, because of evasion about hospitality from a millionaire or because he may have infracted ministerial codes, but because (1) he brought our roads to standstill, (2) he was a keen advocate of postal voting which, as predicted, led to widespread fraud, (3) he created monstrous regional assemblies, (4) he dictated to local authorities that they must concrete over much of S. England's green space, (5) he introduced guidelines which effectively prevent council candidates from campaigning on contentious issues in their own wards.
If you have information about election fraud in Hackney, this is the place to blow the whistle. You can contact this website confidentially by clicking on "comments" below the most recent posting and sending a comment under an anonymous or fictitious name. Unlike email, this service does not transmit any address information from which you can be traced. The service is managed by the Blogger hosting service but moderated by me, so I will read your comments before publishing and will respect any request not to publish. Bear in mind that, as I will not receive any address information, the only way I will be able to respond will be via a follow-up comment.
A word about evidence. Most of what people think is material evidence of a criminal offence is in fact either hearsay evidence (asserted, but without any proof) or circumstantial evidence (suggests guilt but does not prove it). For an introduction to the subject of evidence, try: